Re: [ PATCH ] Documentation: fixed typos

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 3/17/22 08:25, kushagra765@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From ade08e81a63db0faf39791f9cd7c87e5787186f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Kushagra Verma <kushagra765@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 20:37:36 +0530
> Subject: [PATCH] Documentation: fixed typos
> 
>    1. Documentation/admin-guide/bootconfig.rst:207: fixed a typo in the word 'concatenated`
>    2. Documentation/atomic_t.txt:327: fixed a typo in the word `architecture`
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kushagra Verma <kushagra765@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

for the text changes.
But you should Cc one or more maintainers and the file's "owner". (done now)

> ---
>  Documentation/admin-guide/bootconfig.rst | 2 +-
>  Documentation/atomic_t.txt               | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/bootconfig.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/bootconfig.rst
> index a1860fc0ca88..d4ea063aca0c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/bootconfig.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/bootconfig.rst
> @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ In addition to the kernel command line, the boot config can be used for
>  passing the kernel parameters. All the key-value pairs under ``kernel``
>  key will be passed to kernel cmdline directly. Moreover, the key-value
>  pairs under ``init`` will be passed to init process via the cmdline.
> -The parameters are concatinated with user-given kernel cmdline string
> +The parameters are concatenated with user-given kernel cmdline string
>  as the following order, so that the command line parameter can override
>  bootconfig parameters (this depends on how the subsystem handles parameters
>  but in general, earlier parameter will be overwritten by later one.)::
> diff --git a/Documentation/atomic_t.txt b/Documentation/atomic_t.txt
> index 0f1ffa03db09..d7adc6d543db 100644
> --- a/Documentation/atomic_t.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/atomic_t.txt
> @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ atomic operations.
>  
>  Specifically 'simple' cmpxchg() loops are expected to not starve one another
>  indefinitely. However, this is not evident on LL/SC architectures, because
> -while an LL/SC architecure 'can/should/must' provide forward progress
> +while an LL/SC architecture 'can/should/must' provide forward progress
>  guarantees between competing LL/SC sections, such a guarantee does not
>  transfer to cmpxchg() implemented using LL/SC. Consider:
>  

thanks.
-- 
~Randy



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux