> -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen Warren [mailto:swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 2:09 AM > To: Lee Jones > Cc: J, KEERTHY; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; rob.herring@xxxxxxxxxxx; > rob@xxxxxxxxxxx; mturquette@xxxxxxxxxx; sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > wim@xxxxxxxxx; lgirdwood@xxxxxxxxx; gg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Kristo, Tero; > Ian Lartey > Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: DT bindings for the palmas family MFD > > On 06/03/2013 08:18 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Mon, 03 Jun 2013, J Keerthy wrote: > >> Add the various binding files for the palmas family of chips. There > >> is a top level MFD binding then a seperate binding for regulators IP > blocks on chips. > > >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/palmas.txt > >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/palmas.txt > > >> +Example: > >> + > >> +palmas { > > > > Should this be 'palmas@48 {', as it has an address? > > It's common to only include the unit-address (@48) if it's needed to > make the node name unique (i.e. if you had multiple palmas devices). Yeah. We generally have one Palmas device. > > >> diff --git > >> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/palmas-pmic.txt > >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/palmas-pmic.txt > > > See: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/gpio-regulator.txt > > > >> + ti,sleep-mode - mode to adopt in pmic sleep 0 - off, 1 - > auto, > >> + 2 - eco, 3 - forced pwm > > > > I've seen lots of sleep-mode properties, can't we define a generic > > one? > > Isn't it HW-specific? Yeah. Hence it is ti,sleep-mode. Regards, Keerthy ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{����* jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
