Hi Jon,
On 1/30/22 18:36, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Fix multiple "code-block::" warnings by adding "none" as the type of
> code-block. Mends these warnings:
>
> Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst:71: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
> Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst:120: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
> Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst:126: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
> Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst:132: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
> Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst:139: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
> Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst:145: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
> Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst:195: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
> Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst:208: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
> Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst:238: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
>
> Fixes: a32fa6b2e8b4 ("Documentation: dev-tools: Add KTAP specification")
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Are you planning to pick up this patch?
I had independently included the same fix in another patch series, but David Gow
let me know that Randy's patch already existed, so I removed this fix from my
patch.
Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@xxxxxxxx>
-Frank
> ---
> Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst | 18 +++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> --- linux-next-20220128.orig/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst
> +++ linux-next-20220128/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ Test case result lines
> Test case result lines indicate the final status of a test.
> They are required and must have the format:
>
> -.. code-block::
> +.. code-block:: none
>
> <result> <number> [<description>][ # [<directive>] [<diagnostic data>]]
>
> @@ -117,32 +117,32 @@ separator.
>
> Example result lines include:
>
> -.. code-block::
> +.. code-block:: none
>
> ok 1 test_case_name
>
> The test "test_case_name" passed.
>
> -.. code-block::
> +.. code-block:: none
>
> not ok 1 test_case_name
>
> The test "test_case_name" failed.
>
> -.. code-block::
> +.. code-block:: none
>
> ok 1 test # SKIP necessary dependency unavailable
>
> The test "test" was SKIPPED with the diagnostic message "necessary dependency
> unavailable".
>
> -.. code-block::
> +.. code-block:: none
>
> not ok 1 test # TIMEOUT 30 seconds
>
> The test "test" timed out, with diagnostic data "30 seconds".
>
> -.. code-block::
> +.. code-block:: none
>
> ok 5 check return code # rcode=0
>
> @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ line and should end before the parent te
>
> An example of a test with two nested subtests:
>
> -.. code-block::
> +.. code-block:: none
>
> KTAP version 1
> 1..1
> @@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ An example of a test with two nested sub
>
> An example format with multiple levels of nested testing:
>
> -.. code-block::
> +.. code-block:: none
>
> KTAP version 1
> 1..2
> @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ nested version line, uses a line of the
>
> Example KTAP output
> --------------------
> -.. code-block::
> +.. code-block:: none
>
> KTAP version 1
> 1..1
