On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 04:29:28PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > The applying patches document > > (Documentation/process/applying-patches.rst) mentions incremental stable > > patches, but there is no example of how to apply them. Describe the > > process. > > > > While at it, remove note about incremental patches and move the external > > link of 5.x.y incremental patches to "Where can I download patches?" > > section. > > > > Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> > > Cc: SeongJae Park <sjpark@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/process/applying-patches.rst | 28 ++++++++++++++++++---- > > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > I've applied this, thanks. I do have to wonder, though, how useful this > information is anymore. Does anybody actually apply kernel-patch files > this far into the Git era? > > Thanks, > > jon I do. I have several machines with multiple systems (current, old, older, experimental) and mostly I build current kernels in the current system, and older LTS in the old systems. Ideally I will find time to test an rc, but I only use git for kernels when I need to bisect. I find it much easier to keep the initial relase tarball and chosen point patches on my local nfs. My interests are userspace, and some of my machines are comparatively slow to compile kernels. ĸen -- The beauty of reading a page of de Selby is that it leads one inescapably to the conclusion that one is not, of all nincompoops, the greatest. -- du Garbandier
