Re: [PATCH] docs/kernel-parameters: update description of mem=

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/9/22 3:24 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:

> From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The existing description of mem= does not cover all the cases and
> differences between how architectures treat it.
> 
> Extend the description to match the code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> This is in a way a followup for the discussion of mem= usage on MIPS:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/1646461289-31992-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 
>  .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index f5a27f067db9..f3597841a031 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -2834,6 +2834,15 @@
>  			2 when the kernel is not able to see the whole system memory;
>  			3 memory that lies after 'mem=' boundary is excluded from
>  			 the hypervisor, then assigned to KVM guests.
> +			4 to limit the memory available for kdump kernel.
> +
> +			[ARC,MICROBLAZE] - the limit applies only to low memory,
> +			high memory is not affected.
> +
> +			[ARM64] - only limits memory covered by the linear
> +			mapping. The NOMAP regions are not affected.
> +
> +			[HEXAGON] - must be use

   Used?

> to set the memory size, there is

   What? :-)

[...]

MBR, Sergey



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux