[PATCH v2 3/5] fpga: dfl: fix VF creation in IOFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In IOFS legacy model, there is only 1 Port device related to
1 VF, the flag DFL_FEAT_PORT_CONNECTED_AFU will take notes for
this model. In legacy model, it need to check the released port
number match VF device number or not. But in "Multiple VFs per
PR slot" model, the Port device would not connected to AFU/PR
slot, so we don't need to release the Port device before creating
the VFs.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tianfei zhang <tianfei.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/fpga/dfl.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl.c
index 9b7a01a4af04..afa9311c30d5 100644
--- a/drivers/fpga/dfl.c
+++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl.c
@@ -1708,11 +1708,13 @@ int dfl_fpga_cdev_config_ports_vf(struct dfl_fpga_cdev *cdev, int num_vfs)
 
 	mutex_lock(&cdev->lock);
 	/*
-	 * can't turn multiple ports into 1 VF device, only 1 port for 1 VF
-	 * device, so if released port number doesn't match VF device number,
-	 * then reject the request with -EINVAL error code.
+	 * In the IOFS legacy model, it can't turn multiple ports into 1 VF
+	 * device, because only 1 port conneced to 1 VF device, so if released
+	 * port number doesn't match VF device number, then reject the request
+	 * with -EINVAL error code.
 	 */
-	if (cdev->released_port_num != num_vfs) {
+	if ((cdev->features & DFL_FEAT_PORT_CONNECTED_AFU) &&
+	    cdev->released_port_num != num_vfs) {
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 		goto done;
 	}
-- 
2.26.2




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux