On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 02:11:46PM +0900, Jonghyeon Kim wrote: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 09:53:02AM +0000, SeongJae Park wrote: > > Hello Jonghyeon, > > > > On Fri, 18 Feb 2022 19:26:08 +0900 Jonghyeon Kim <tome01@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > Current DAMON_RECALIM is not compatible with the NUMA memory system. To > > > proactively reclaim memory, DAMON_RECLAIM kernel thread(kdamond) has to wake up > > > before kswapd does reclaim memory. However, the current watermark for proactive > > > reclamation is based on entire system free memory. So, though the one memory > > > node is fully used, kdamond is not waked up. > > > > > > These patches clarify watermarks of DAMOS and enable monitoring per NUMA node > > > proactive reclamation on DAMON_RECLAIM. > > > > The high level concept of this patchset looks good to me. Nevertheless, maybe > > there is some rooms for improvement. I left some comments on patches. > > > > > > Thanks, > > SJ > > > > Hello SeongJae, > > Thanks for your patient comments about these patches. I will clean up and > develop these patches including your suggestion and correction in next version. > > > Jonghyeon
