On Fri, 18 Feb 2022, Tom Rix wrote:
On 2/18/22 1:03 AM, Zhang, Tianfei wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Rix <trix@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 12:16 AM
To: Zhang, Tianfei <tianfei.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>; Wu, Hao <hao.wu@xxxxxxxxx>;
mdf@xxxxxxxxxx; Xu, Yilun <yilun.xu@xxxxxxxxx>;
linux-fpga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: corbet@xxxxxxx; Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 7/7] fpga: dfl: pci: Add generic OFS PCI PID
On 2/14/22 3:26 AM, Tianfei zhang wrote:
From: Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Add the PCI product id for an Open FPGA Stack PCI card.
Is there a URL to the card ?
This PCIe Device IDs have registered by Intel.
A URL is useful to introduce the board, Is there one ?
Signed-off-by: Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tianfei Zhang <tianfei.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c index
83b604d6dbe6..cb2fbf3eb918 100644
--- a/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c
+++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c
@@ -76,12 +76,14 @@ static void cci_pci_free_irq(struct pci_dev *pcidev)
#define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_PAC_D5005 0x0B2B
#define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_SILICOM_PAC_N5010 0x1000
#define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_SILICOM_PAC_N5011 0x1001
+#define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_OFS 0xbcce
INTEL_OFS is a generic name, pci id's map to specific cards
Is there a more specific name for this card ?
I think using INTEL_OFS is better, because INTEL_OFS is the Generic
development platform can support multiple cards which using OFS
specification,
like Intel PAC N6000 card.
I would prefer something like PCIE_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_PAC_N6000 because it
follows an existing pattern. Make it easy on a developer, they will look at
their board or box, see X and try to find something similar in the driver
source.
To use OSF_ * the name needs a suffix to differentiate it from future cards
that will also use ofs.
If this really is a generic id please explain in the doc patch how every
future board with use this single id and how a driver could work around a hw
problem in a specific board with a pci id covering multiple boards.
Tom
Hi Tom,
The intent is to have a generic device id that can be used with many
different boards. Currently, we have FPGA implementations for 3 different
boards using this generic id. We may need a better name for device id
than OFS. More precisely this generic device id means a PCI function that
is described by a Device Feature List (DFL). How about
PCIE_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_DFL?
With a DFL device id, the functionality of the PF/VF is determined by the
contents of the DFL. Each Device Feature Header (DFH) in the DFL has a
revision field that can be used identify "broken" hw, or new functionality
added to a feature. Additionally, since the DFL is typically used in a
FPGA, the broken hardware, can and should be fixed in most cases.
Matthew
Tom
/* VF Device */
#define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_VF_INT_5_X 0xBCBF
#define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_VF_INT_6_X 0xBCC1
#define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_VF_DSC_1_X 0x09C5
#define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_PAC_D5005_VF 0x0B2C
+#define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_OFS_VF 0xbccf
static struct pci_device_id cci_pcie_id_tbl[] = {
{PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCIE_DEVICE_ID_PF_INT_5_X),},
@@
-95,6 +97,8 @@ static struct pci_device_id cci_pcie_id_tbl[] = {
{PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL,
PCIE_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_PAC_D5005_VF),},
{PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_SILICOM_DENMARK,
PCIE_DEVICE_ID_SILICOM_PAC_N5010),},
{PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_SILICOM_DENMARK,
PCIE_DEVICE_ID_SILICOM_PAC_N5011),},
+ {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCIE_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_OFS),},
+ {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL,
PCIE_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_OFS_VF),},
{0,}
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, cci_pcie_id_tbl);
