On 2022/1/26 8:14, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
GUO Zihua <guozihua@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
From: Guo Zihua <guozihua@xxxxxxxxxx>
Commandline parameter ima_hash= and ima_template= has order requirement
for them to work correctly together. Namely ima_hash= must be
specified after ima_template=, otherwise ima_template= will be ignored.
The reason is that when handling ima_hash=, ima template would be set to
the default value if it has not been initialized already, and that value
cannot be changed afterwards by ima_template=.
This patch adds this limitation to the documentation.
Reviewed-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Guo Zihua <guozihua@xxxxxxxxxx>
I've applied this, but I'm wondering: where did this review take place?
I can't find it on the lists...
Thanks,
jon
.
Hi Jonathan,
Thank you very much and sorry for the confusion here. The reviewed by is
more like a face-to-face peer review and I would like to mention that in
the patch. If this is problematic I would stop doing that from now on.
--
Best
GUO Zihua
