[PATCH v2 6/6] Documentation: coresight: Expand branch broadcast documentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Now that there is a way of enabling branch broadcast via perf, mention
the possible use cases and known limitations.

Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@xxxxxxx>
---
 .../trace/coresight/coresight-etm4x-reference.rst      | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/trace/coresight/coresight-etm4x-reference.rst b/Documentation/trace/coresight/coresight-etm4x-reference.rst
index 0439b4006227..ec336575919c 100644
--- a/Documentation/trace/coresight/coresight-etm4x-reference.rst
+++ b/Documentation/trace/coresight/coresight-etm4x-reference.rst
@@ -656,7 +656,15 @@ Bit assignments shown below:-
     ETM_MODE_BB
 
 **description:**
-    Set to enable branch broadcast if supported in hardware [IDR0].
+    Set to enable branch broadcast if supported in hardware [IDR0]. The primary use for this feature
+    is when code is patched dynamically at run time and the full program flow may not be able to be
+    reconstructed using only conditional branches.
+
+    Choosing this option will result in a significant increase in the amount of trace generated -
+    possible danger of overflows, or fewer instructions covered. Note, that this option also
+    overrides any setting of :ref:`ETM_MODE_RETURNSTACK <coresight-return-stack>`, so where a branch
+    broadcast range overlaps a return stack range, return stacks will not be available for that
+    range.
 
 .. _coresight-cycle-accurate:
 
-- 
2.28.0




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux