On Sun, 2022-01-02 at 13:46 -0800, Ricardo Neri wrote: > On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 07:43:22PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 4:23 PM Ricardo Neri > > <ricardo.neri-calderon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > [...] > > This looks like it may be too general, because HFI is not a > > thermal-only thing. > > > > > Maybe cal it INTEL_HFI_THERMAL? > > True. The *Enhanced* HFI introduces the concept of thread classes > [1]. I was > planning to wrap this patchset, which parses the HFI table and deals > with updates, as INTEL_HFI. The code that deals with classes would be > wrapped as INTEL_EHFI. > > After this comment, so you still think that INTEL_HFI_THERMAL makes > more > sense? In general most of the configs for Intel thermal is has THERMAL suffix, so to be consistent may be add THERMAL also at the end. You can still add INTEL_EHFI as a silent config, which user will not select. It will be selected by default with INTEL_HFI_THERMAL. Thanks, Srinivas > > Thanks and BR, > Ricardo > > > [1]. > https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/download/intel-architecture-instruction-set-extensions-programming-reference.html > , Chapter 13 >
