[PATCH] docs: scheduler: Fix outdated parameter of rebalance_domains

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



According to the function prototype of rebalance_domains(), its first
parameter is *rq* and the document need to be updated.

Signed-off-by: Tang Yizhou <tangyizhou@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 Documentation/scheduler/sched-domains.rst | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-domains.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-domains.rst
index 84dcdcd2911c..e57ad28301bd 100644
--- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-domains.rst
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-domains.rst
@@ -37,10 +37,10 @@ rebalancing event for the current runqueue has arrived. The actual load
 balancing workhorse, run_rebalance_domains()->rebalance_domains(), is then run
 in softirq context (SCHED_SOFTIRQ).
 
-The latter function takes two arguments: the current CPU and whether it was idle
-at the time the scheduler_tick() happened and iterates over all sched domains
-our CPU is on, starting from its base domain and going up the ->parent chain.
-While doing that, it checks to see if the current domain has exhausted its
+The latter function takes two arguments: the runqueue of current CPU and whether
+the CPU was idle at the time the scheduler_tick() happened and iterates over all
+sched domains our CPU is on, starting from its base domain and going up the ->parent
+chain. While doing that, it checks to see if the current domain has exhausted its
 rebalance interval. If so, it runs load_balance() on that domain. It then checks
 the parent sched_domain (if it exists), and the parent of the parent and so
 forth.
-- 
2.17.1




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux