On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 11:32:45AM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 12/1/21 12:45 AM, Eric Biggers wrote: > > This series consolidates the documentation for /sys/block/<disk>/queue/ > > into Documentation/ABI/, where it is supposed to go (as per Greg KH: > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/YaXXpEAwVGTLjp1e@xxxxxxxxx). > > > > This series also updates MAINTAINERS to associate the block > > documentation with the block layer. > > > > This series applies to linux-block/for-next. > > > > Eric Biggers (7): > > docs: sysfs-block: sort alphabetically > > docs: sysfs-block: add contact for nomerges > > docs: sysfs-block: fill in missing documentation from queue-sysfs.rst > > docs: sysfs-block: document stable_writes > > docs: sysfs-block: document virt_boundary_mask > > docs: block: remove queue-sysfs.rst > > MAINTAINERS: add entries for block layer documentation > > > > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-block | 766 ++++++++++++++++++-------- > > Documentation/block/index.rst | 1 - > > Documentation/block/queue-sysfs.rst | 321 ----------- > > MAINTAINERS | 2 + > > 4 files changed, 545 insertions(+), 545 deletions(-) > > delete mode 100644 Documentation/block/queue-sysfs.rst > > How about adding a patch that moves Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-block > to Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block? The block layer sysfs ABI is used > widely by user space software and is considered stable. > That would make sense. I decided not to include it in this patch series since some of the sysfs-block files were added recently, so may not be as "stable" as ones that have been around for 18 years, and because about 90% of the sysfs documentation is in the "testing" directory anyway so it is not unusual. So I felt it should be a separate change. I think these patches should go in first, and then I can send a separate patch that moves the file to the stable directory, if there is no objection to it. - Eric
