Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> This manual requires registration (with a fair amount of information >> required) to get. That should at least be mentioned if we can't find a >> less obnoxious version out there. > > Well, I'm afraid that's the best we may get as of now. I wish is was available > with no registration whatsoever, but at least it could be easily had now by > wide audience. > > Anyways, I'm wondering what kind of mention do you think is appropriate here? > Somehting like: "note, registration is required"? Something like that would be helpful, I think, yes. >> > +Building the Linux kernel for ARC processors >> > +############################################ >> > + >> > +The process of kernel building for ARC processors is the same as for any other >> > +architecture and could be done in 2 ways: >> > + >> > +1. cross-compilation: process of compiling for ARC targets on a development >> > +host with a different processor architecture (generally x86_64/amd64). >> > + >> > +2. native compilation: process of compiling for ARC on a ARC platform >> > +(hardware board or a simulator like QEMU) with complete development environment >> > +(GNU toolchain, dtc, make etc) installed on the platform. >> >> These enumerated lists would render a lot more pleasantly if you >> actually formatted them as RST enumerated lists - with lines after the >> first indented. > > Indeed, I'm much more used to Markdown and there it works ;) > So should I send a re-spin with fixed version? I applied the patch, so please send improvements on top of that. Thanks, jon
