On Wednesday 08 May 2013, Greg KH wrote: > > just mention there is not hardware reason to not use the generic ttySx > > in place of ttyAS as we have only one IP that handle serial on this > > family of SoC > > > > personally I'll switch to ttySx > > Great, then you can use the same major/minor range as well, so there's > no more objection from me about this :) Does that work these days when you have kernel with multiple built-in uart drivers? I think it would be good if all uarts were using the same name space and major/minor numbers, but I think the mess we currently have is the result of the tty_register_driver() interface reserving the device number range at driver load time, independent of the presence of devices. I would assume that normal distro kernels always ship with an 8250 driver built-in to allow using that as the console, and if I read the code correctly, that currently prevents another uart driver from registering the same major/minor numbers. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html