On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 11:30:51AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 06:33:07PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote: > > Add the CPUID feature bit and the model-specific registers needed to > > identify and configure the Intel Hardware Feedback Interface. > > > > Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 1 + > > arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 6 ++++++ > > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h > > index d0ce5cfd3ac1..d76d8daf1b2b 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h > > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h > > @@ -325,6 +325,7 @@ > > #define X86_FEATURE_HWP_ACT_WINDOW (14*32+ 9) /* HWP Activity Window */ > > #define X86_FEATURE_HWP_EPP (14*32+10) /* HWP Energy Perf. Preference */ > > #define X86_FEATURE_HWP_PKG_REQ (14*32+11) /* HWP Package Level Request */ > > +#define X86_FEATURE_INTEL_HFI (14*32+19) /* Hardware Feedback Interface */ > > X86_FEATURE_HFI > > i.e., without the vendor name is perfectly fine. Thank you very much for looking at the patch Boris! Sure, I can rename the feature name. BR, Ricardo
