Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > While discussing how to format the addition of various function > attributes, some "unwritten rules" of ordering surfaced[1]. Capture as > close as possible to Linus's preferences for future reference. > > (Though I note the dissent voiced by Joe Perches, Alexey Dobriyan, and > others that would prefer all attributes live on a separate leading line.) > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/mm-commits/CAHk-=wiOCLRny5aifWNhr621kYrJwhfURsa0vFPeUEm8mF0ufg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v4: > - fix another stray "void"! This is why code needs a compiler... (thx randy) > --- > Documentation/process/coding-style.rst | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+) Did I ever mention that I *hate* coding-style patches? :) In this case I think we're as close as to consensus as things get. In the absence of a strong reason to the contrary, I'll apply this before too long. Thanks, jon
