Do you want warning quashing patches at this point in the cycle?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Do you want warning quashing patches at this point in the cycle?
From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 11:13:06 +0100
Cc: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>, Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>, v9fs-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-afs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903

Hi Linus,

Do you want patches that quash warnings from W=1 (mostly kerneldoc warnings in
comments in this case[1]) at this point in the cycle, or would you rather they
waited till the next merge window?

David

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/163281899704.2790286.9177774252843775348.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Do you want warning quashing patches at this point in the cycle?
  - From: Linus Torvalds

Prev by Date: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/17] drm: cleanup: Use DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_* helpers where possible
Next by Date: [PATCH 0/4] Add lan966 documentation and remove lan966x.c file
Previous by thread: [PATCH] docs: update file link location
Next by thread: Re: Do you want warning quashing patches at this point in the cycle?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux FS] [Yosemite Forum] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper] [Linux Resources]