Re: [PATCH v4 08/14] mm/gup: grab head page refcount once for group of subpages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/30/21 04:01, Alistair Popple wrote:
> On Thursday, 30 September 2021 5:34:05 AM AEST Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 12:50:15PM +0100, Joao Martins wrote:
>>
>>>> If the get_dev_pagemap has to remain then it just means we have to
>>>> flush before changing pagemap pointers
>>> Right -- I don't think we should need it as that discussion on the other
>>> thread goes.
>>>
>>> OTOH, using @pgmap might be useful to unblock gup-fast FOLL_LONGTERM
>>> for certain devmap types[0] (like MEMORY_DEVICE_GENERIC [device-dax]
>>> can support it but not MEMORY_DEVICE_FSDAX [fsdax]).
>>
>> When looking at Logan's patches I think it is pretty clear to me that
>> page->pgmap must never be a dangling pointer if the caller has a
>> legitimate refcount on the page.
>>
>> For instance the migrate and stuff all blindly calls
>> is_device_private_page() on the struct page expecting a valid
>> page->pgmap.
>>
>> This also looks like it is happening, ie
>>
>> void __put_page(struct page *page)
>> {
>> 	if (is_zone_device_page(page)) {
>> 		put_dev_pagemap(page->pgmap);
>>
>> Is indeed putting the pgmap ref back when the page becomes ungettable.
>>
>> This properly happens when the page refcount goes to zero and so it
>> should fully interlock with __page_cache_add_speculative():
>>
>> 	if (unlikely(!page_ref_add_unless(page, count, 0))) {
>>
>> Thus, in gup.c, if we succeed at try_grab_compound_head() then
>> page->pgmap is a stable pointer with a valid refcount.
>>
>> So, all the external pgmap stuff in gup.c is completely pointless.
>> try_grab_compound_head() provides us with an equivalent protection at
>> lower cost. Remember gup.c doesn't deref the pgmap at all.
>>
>> Dan/Alistair/Felix do you see any hole in that argument??
> 
> As background note that device pages are currently considered free when
> refcount == 1 but the pgmap reference is dropped when the refcount transitions
> 1->0. The final pgmap reference is typically dropped when a driver calls
> memunmap_pages() and put_page() drops the last page reference:
> 
> void memunmap_pages(struct dev_pagemap *pgmap)
> {
>         unsigned long pfn;
>         int i;
> 
>         dev_pagemap_kill(pgmap);
>         for (i = 0; i < pgmap->nr_range; i++)
>                 for_each_device_pfn(pfn, pgmap, i)
>                         put_page(pfn_to_page(pfn));
>         dev_pagemap_cleanup(pgmap);
> 
> If there are still pgmap references dev_pagemap_cleanup(pgmap) will block until
> the final reference is dropped. So I think your argument holds at least for
> DEVICE_PRIVATE and DEVICE_GENERIC. DEVICE_FS_DAX defines it's own pagemap
> cleanup but I can't see why the same argument wouldn't hold there - if a page
> has a valid refcount it must have a reference on the pagemap too.

IIUC Dan's reasoning was that fsdax wasn't able to deal with surprise removal [1] so his
patches were to ensure fsdax (or the pmem block device) poisons/kills the pages as a way
to notify filesystem/dm that the page was to be kept unmapped:

[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/161604050314.1463742.14151665140035795571.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

But if fsdax doesn't wait for all the pgmap references[*] on its pagemap cleanup callback
then what's the pgmap ref in __gup_device_huge() pairs/protects us up against that is
specific to fsdax?

I am not sure I follow how both the fsdax specific issue ties in with this pgmap ref being
there above.

	Joao

[*] or at least fsdax_pagemap_ops doesn't suggest the contrary ... compared to
dev_pagemap_{kill,cleanup}



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux