On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 05:29:07PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > I'm not convinced the swiotlb use describe there falls under "intended > use" - mapping a 1280x720 framebuffer in a single chunk? (As an aside, > the bottom of this page is also confusing, as following "Then we can > confirm the modified swiotlb size in the boot log:" there is a log > fragment showing the same original size of 64Mb. It doesn't. We also do not add hacks to the kernel for whacky out of tree modules.
