On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 10:29:13AM +0300, Alexandru Ardelean wrote: > This change introduces a device-managed variant to the > iio_map_array_register() function. It's a simple implementation of calling > iio_map_array_register() and registering a callback to > iio_map_array_unregister() with the devm_add_action_or_reset(). > > The function uses an explicit 'dev' parameter to bind the unwinding to. It > could have been implemented to implicitly use the parent of the IIO device, > however it shouldn't be too expensive to callers to just specify to which > device object to bind this unwind call. > It would make the API a bit more flexible. AFAIU this dev pointer is kinda discussable thing. What scenario do you expect (have in mind) when it shouldn't use parent? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
