On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 01:51:53PM -0700, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
> +DEFINE_IDTENTRY_ERRORCODE(exc_control_protection)
> +{
> + struct task_struct *tsk;
> +
> + if (!user_mode(regs)) {
> + pr_emerg("PANIC: unexpected kernel control protection fault\n");
No need for that call...
> + die("kernel control protection fault", regs, error_code);
... as this one can say "unexpected" in the string too.
> + panic("Machine halted.");
> + }
> +
> + cond_local_irq_enable(regs);
> +
> + if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK))
cpu_feature_enabled()
> + WARN_ONCE(1, "Control protection fault with CET support disabled\n");
> +
> + tsk = current;
> + tsk->thread.error_code = error_code;
> + tsk->thread.trap_nr = X86_TRAP_CP;
> +
> + /*
> + * Ratelimit to prevent log spamming.
> + */
> + if (show_unhandled_signals && unhandled_signal(tsk, SIGSEGV) &&
> + __ratelimit(&cpf_rate)) {
> + unsigned long ssp;
> + int cpf_type;
> +
> + cpf_type = array_index_nospec(error_code, ARRAY_SIZE(control_protection_err));
> +
> + rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP, ssp);
> + pr_emerg("%s[%d] control protection ip:%lx sp:%lx ssp:%lx error:%lx(%s)",
> + tsk->comm, task_pid_nr(tsk),
> + regs->ip, regs->sp, ssp, error_code,
> + control_protection_err[cpf_type]);
> + print_vma_addr(KERN_CONT " in ", regs->ip);
> + pr_cont("\n");
> + }
> +
> + force_sig_fault(SIGSEGV, SEGV_CPERR, (void __user *)0);
> + cond_local_irq_disable(regs);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> static bool do_int3(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> int res;
> diff --git a/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h b/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h
> index 5a3c221f4c9d..a1a153ea3cc3 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h
> @@ -235,7 +235,8 @@ typedef struct siginfo {
> #define SEGV_ADIPERR 7 /* Precise MCD exception */
> #define SEGV_MTEAERR 8 /* Asynchronous ARM MTE error */
> #define SEGV_MTESERR 9 /* Synchronous ARM MTE exception */
> -#define NSIGSEGV 9
> +#define SEGV_CPERR 10 /* Control protection fault */
> +#define NSIGSEGV 10
>
> /*
> * SIGBUS si_codes
> --
Was there a manpage patch for the user-visible bits?
I seem to remember something flying by very vaguely ...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
