On 04/03/2013 08:40 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > This is the nineth version of the Tegra114 clockframework. It is based on the > next-20130320-fixed branch of > git://nv-tegra.nvidia.com/user/swarren/linux-2.6.git, That's not a particularly useful base; these patches won't be applied to linux-next, but rather to Tegra's for-3.10/clk branch, with the clock for-next tree merged in to pick up "clk: add table lookup to mux". > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/229972/ and That is "clk: tegra: Don't enable PLLs during early boot". That was rejected. I assume this isn't really needed given your changelog entry "Fixed clock initialization for audio", but rather my "clk: tegra: defer application of init table" should be applied instead? > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/229978/ and For reference, that is "clk: add table lookup to mux", which is in the clock for-next tree. > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/233415/ That is Joseph's "clocksource: tegra: enable arch_timer". Is this actually a dependency, or an optimization, or ...? Rob Herring objected to that patch since it isn't necessary if his series "ARM arch, sp804 and integrator timer CLKSRC_OF support" is applied. If I apply just your (Peter's) CCF series without Joseph's or Rob's patches, will everything still work, or is this a hard dependency to create a working system? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
