On 26/03/13 09:34, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 March 2013 02:57 PM, Graeme Gregory wrote:
>> On 26/03/13 09:12, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 26 March 2013 02:31 PM, Graeme Gregory wrote:
>>>
>>> But still you are using the PALMAS macro here and indirectly it is
>>> tied up. It is not completely independent.
>>> If need to be independent then regmap pointer with address need to be
>>> passed as independt header and no where on code whould refer the PALMA.
>>> I think as per current code, it is not possible although it is your
>>> big plan what I understand from some time back in one of patch
>>> discussion.
>>>
>> It is actually almost possible, but it is something I gave up looking
>> at. You can get the regmap of your parent i2c device without having
>> knowledge of the type of parent.
>
> There is multiple regmap of parent and hence getting correct regmap is
> really issue. May be RTC require regmap[0] and gpio require regmap[1].
>
If you notice each regmap is connected to the correct dummy. Its
possible to create the correct children per dummy. The twl6030 driver
does this. But this is pointless now as I never intend to work on it so
we shall go with the tightly coupled.
>
>>
>>>>>>> + palmas_usb->dev = &pdev->dev;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + palmas_usb->irq1 = regmap_irq_get_virq(palmas->irq_data,
>>>>>>> + PALMAS_ID_OTG_IRQ);
>>>>>>> + palmas_usb->irq2 = regmap_irq_get_virq(palmas->irq_data,
>>>>>>> + PALMAS_ID_IRQ);
>>>>>>> + palmas_usb->irq3 = regmap_irq_get_virq(palmas->irq_data,
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> PALMAS_VBUS_OTG_IRQ);
>>>>>>> + palmas_usb->irq4 = regmap_irq_get_virq(palmas->irq_data,
>>>>>>> + PALMAS_VBUS_IRQ);
>>>>>> Should be come from platform_get_irq() through platform driver.
>>>>> No. It can be obtained from regmap too.
>>> Kishon,
>>> I think it is very much possible. You can pass the interrupt throough
>>> IRQ_RESOURCE and populate it from DT. If you provide proper interrupt
>>> parent and irq number then irq framework take care of every thing.
>>> already tested this with RTC interrupt of plama and it worked very
>>> well.
>>>
>> If we are tightly coupling as above then using platform_irq is an extra
>> inefficiency. You both have to populate this then parse it afterwards.
>> Why not just use the regmap helper? Ill admit this code is like this as
>> there was a period where platform irqs in DT just was not working right!
>>
>> We should really agree now if we are going for loose or tight coupling
>> now rather than keep switching?
>
> Here we are hardcoding for PALMAS_ID_OTG_IRQ and so on. If we take
> data from platform then it need not and it will be completely
> independent of palma atleast on this front.
> We need to populate just as:
> palmas: palmas {
> :::::::
> palams_usb_phy {
> compatile = ...
> interrupt-parent = <& palmas>;
> interrupt = < 10, 0,
> 21, 0,
> 22, 0,
> 23, 0>;
> }
>
>
> and in code, we just need to do
> irq1 = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> irq2 = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1);
> etc..
>
>
> So here, actually we do not need to use palmas one and it is
> completely independent.
>
> Also the way you define the DT od palmas, the above one looks more
> appropriate.
>
Ok that makes sense if you are actually planning to feed non palmas IRQs
to the usb via either palmas GPIO or even directly! I did not know there
was such a use case!
Graeme
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
