Hi Grant, The 3rd patch is in preparation for some patches I have in WIP that would allow drivers to set notifications for properties that are changed in runtime. I think that since you have the all configuration taking place via DT and you have a method to alter DT properties in run-time via /proc/device-tree, it's quite straightforward to be able to alter runtime behavior via the same mechanism. I.e. if you have some property that controls a devices behavior, it's intuitive that when you modify that property, the device's state changes accordingly. Regards -- Pantelis On Mar 16, 2013, at 11:45 AM, Grant Likely wrote: > On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 21:31:07 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou <panto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> There are other users for the proc DT functions. >> Export them. >> >> Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou <panto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Hi Pantelis. > > Patches 1 & 2 look good. No comments there. > > This patch bothers me. The manipulation of the proc entries is part and > parcel of adding and removing nodes. The real problem seems to be that > the node addition/removal APIs need to be made usable by the overlay > code. > > g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
