>>>>> "Sekhar" == Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@xxxxxx> writes:
>> Required properties:
>> -- compatible: Must be "ti,am33xx-ecap"
>> +- compatible: Must be "ti,am33xx-ecap" or "ti,da850-ecap"
>> - #pwm-cells: Should be 3. Number of cells being used to specify PWM property.
>> First cell specifies the per-chip index of the PWM to use, the second
>> cell is the period in nanoseconds and bit 0 in the third cell is used to
>> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-tiecap.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-tiecap.c
>> index 22e96e2..e0d96c8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-tiecap.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-tiecap.c
>> @@ -197,6 +197,7 @@ static const struct pwm_ops ecap_pwm_ops = {
>>
>> static const struct of_device_id ecap_of_match[] = {
>> { .compatible = "ti,am33xx-ecap" },
>> + { .compatible = "ti,da850-ecap" },
>> {},
Sekhar> You add a new compatible, but don't really show any changes in
Sekhar> driver in this series. So why can't we simply use
Sekhar> ti,am33xx-ecap on DA850 too?
Indeed, if the hardware block is identical the dts should simply list:
compatible = "ti,da850-ecap", "ti,am33xx-ecap"
And the driver only bind to ti,am33xx-ecap (unless there ever needs to
be a da850 specific workarounde.
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
