On 02/19/2013 11:40 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 01:10:51PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote: >> Once stop_machine() is gone from the CPU offline path, we won't be able to >> depend on preempt_disable() or local_irq_disable() to prevent CPUs from >> going offline from under us. >> >> Use the get/put_online_cpus_atomic() APIs to prevent CPUs from going offline, >> while invoking from atomic context. >> >> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Weird. I see this in the patch but I don't see it in the header? Meaning, you didn't get this email at all? > Did you > explicitly suppress the CC part? > No.. I sent the entire patchset to a set of email ids and in addition to that I CC'ed individual patches to the respective maintainers/lists (the CC: list in the changelog). I used the --auto knob from stgit to do that. > > Anyhow, the patch looks sane enough, thought I need to to run it through > a test framework just to be on a sure side. > Sure, thank you. But you might want to test the v6 that I sent out yesterday instead of v5. Oh, wait a min, you didn't get the v6 mail also? Here it is, for your reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=136119260122255&w=2 Regards, Srivatsa S. Bhat >> Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> >> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: x86@xxxxxxxxxx >> Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Cc: virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
