Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update top level 00-INDEX file with new additions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 13-02-18 10:57 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 02/18/13 01:39, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>> On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>>
>>> It seems there are about 80 new, but undocumented addtions at
>>> the top level Documentation directory.  This fixes up the top
>>> level 00-INDEX by adding new entries and deleting a couple orphans.
>>> Some subdirs could probably still use a check/cleanup too though.
> 
> After this patch, I would prefer to see a requirement that each Documentation/
> file contain a "topic" line and then generate INDEX files from those automatically...
> 
> comments?

Rules can sometimes be so inflexible as to prevent additions.
I think I'd rather see a makefile target that does some sanity
checks, so that kernel janitors and the like are more apt to
send trivial patches before it falls behind by 80+ entries like
it was just recently.   Just my $0.02 opinion.

P.
--

> 
> 
>>> Acked-by: Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Jiri Kosina <trivial@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> [vectoring this via trivial tree as requested by Rob]
>>
>> Applied, thanks.
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux