Re: [RFC 2/8] ARM: twd: register clock event for 1 core SMP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/18/2013 12:30 AM, Afzal Mohammed wrote:
> Register percpu local timer for scheduler tick in the case of one core
> SMP configuration. In other cases - secondary cpu's as well as boot
> cpu's having more than one core, this is being registered as per
> existing boot flow, with a difference that they happens after delay
> calibration. Registering the clock for tick in case of one core should
> be done before Kernel calibrates delay (this is required to boot,
> unless local timer is the only one registered for tick). Registering
> twd local timer at init_time (which platforms are doing now) helps
> achieve that with the proposed change.
> 
> This helps in an almost booting Kernel (minimal) by only relying on
> ARM parts for an A9 one core SMP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Afzal Mohammed <afzal@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c
> index 616268c..118f4f2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c
> @@ -335,6 +335,9 @@ static int __init twd_local_timer_common_register(struct device_node *np)
>  
>  	twd_get_clock(np);
>  
> +	if (num_possible_cpus() == 1)
> +		twd_timer_setup(evt);
> +

Shouldn't this be fixed in the core code, so the same issue is fixed for
all timers?

Rob

>  	return 0;
>  
>  out_irq:
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux