On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> The patch would not break it -- it defaults the sysctl to staying enabled. >> >> If you mean the documentation should be updated, sure, that's easy to do. >> >> David: I know you aren't a fan of this patch, but I'd like to try to >> convince you. :) This leaves the feature enabled and add a toggle for >> systems (like Chrome OS) that don't want to risk this DoS at all. >> There are so very many other toggle, I don't see why this one would be >> a problem to add. > > Chrome OS has no plans to implement webrtc? Last I had read that > support had been added to the release versions of Chrome, and was in the > development builds of firefox. I really don't belive that there are > many systems that don't intend to run a web browser. I haven't looked at the internals of webrtc. Are you implying some feature in it relies on the TCP simultaneous connect? -Kees -- Kees Cook Chrome OS Security -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
