On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> + i2c-parent = <&{/i2c@12CA0000}>;
>
> Why use this custom i2c-parent property? The arbitrator should just be
> under the i2c controller in the device tree, and thus parent would be
> derived from the topology there.
Ah. Reading up on the discussions for the other mux bindings, there's
the issue of the arbitrator not being addressable/accessible via i2c.
Sigh, awkward and annoying, since it breaks the topography for the
hardware apart due to the arbitrator. But I guess there's no good
alternative. :(
-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
