Hi,
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 15:07:54, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [...]
>
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/davinci_mmc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/davinci_mmc.txt
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 0000000..6717ab1
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/davinci_mmc.txt
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
> > > > +* TI Highspeed MMC host controller for DaVinci
> > > > +
> > > > +The Highspeed MMC Host Controller on TI DaVinci family
> > > > +provides an interface for MMC, SD and SDIO types of memory cards.
> > > > +
> > > > +This file documents the properties used by the davinci_mmc driver.
> > > > +
> > > > +Required properties:
> > > > +- compatible:
> > > > + Should be "ti,davinci-mmc-da830": for da830, da850, dm365
> > > > + Should be "ti,davinci-mmc-dm355": for dm355, dm644x
> > > > +
> > > > +Optional properties:
> > > > +- bus-width: Number of data lines, can be <4>, or <8>, default <1>
> > > > +- max-frequency: Maximum operating clock frequency, default 25MHz.
> > > > +- mmc-cap-mmc-highspeed: Indicates support for MMC in high speed mode
> > > > +- mmc-cap-sd-highspeed: Indicates support for SD in high speed mode
>
> [...]
>
>
> > > > +static struct davinci_mmc_config
> > > > + *mmc_parse_pdata(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > {
> > > > + struct device_node *np;
> > > > struct davinci_mmc_config *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> > > > + const struct of_device_id *match =
> > > > + of_match_device(of_match_ptr(davinci_mmc_dt_ids), &pdev->dev);
> > > > + u32 data;
> > > > +
> > > > + np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > > > + if (!np)
> > > > + return pdata;
> > > > +
> > > > + pdata = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > + if (!pdata) {
> > > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to allocate memory for struct davinci_mmc_config\n");
> > > > + goto nodata;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + if (match->data)
> > > > + pdata->version = (u8)((int)match->data);
> > > > +
> > > > + of_property_read_u32(np, "max-frequency", &pdata->max_freq);
> > > > + if (!pdata->max_freq)
> > > > + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "'max-frequency' property not specified, defaulting to 25MHz\n");
> > > > +
> > > > + if (of_get_property(np, "mmc-cap-mmc-highspeed", NULL))
> > > > + pdata->caps |= MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED;
> > > > + if (of_get_property(np, "mmc-cap-sd-highspeed", NULL))
> > > > + pdata->caps |= MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED;
> > >
> > > If these aren't derivable from max-frequency, you could use
> > > of_property_read_bool to make this clearer.
> > >
> >
> > Correct, I will decide these based on max-frequency.
> >
> > > > +
> > > > + of_property_read_u32(np, "bus-width", &data);
> > > > + switch (data) {
> > > > + case 0:
> > >
> > > Judging by the binding doc, should this be 1 rather than 0?
> > >
> >
> > By default driver comes up in 4 bit mode when bus-width is not specified.
> > Bus-width is set to 1 bit for invalid bus-widths. Below are the cases
> > when bus-width 0 or 4, bus-width is set to 4bit mode
> > When bus-width is 8, bus-width is set to 8 bit mode
>
> Why is 0 a special value that means 4? Why not just use 4?
>
> Here you just assign 0 to pdata->wires.
>
> I see the current version of the driver handles this specially in
> davinci_mmcsd_probe, but I don't see why this should leak into the binding.
>
Yes, I was trying to push in current driver behavior into binding documentation.
> What I was originally trying to get at is that the binding says 8, 4, and 1 are
> acceptable values, but you check the cases 8, 4, or 0. So you're accepting
> something not documented, and producing a warning in a valid case (1).
>
Valid point.
> >
> > I thought that if somebody specifies bus-width as 2, 3, 5, 6, 7..., then
> > it should be defaulted to 1 bit mode, so I specified it as 1 bit in binding doc.
>
> If they specify something invalid, falling back to a sane value with a warning
> sounds good.
>
True.
> > But I feel that a person who is editing dts file will not make such a mistake.
> > I will change binding document to default as 4 bit mode.
>
> There have been and inevitably will be plenty of errors in dts files. I think
> it'd be good to provide a warning and either use a value that's guaranteed to
> work, or bail out if that can't be done.
>
> If it's always valid to use 1 data line even if the hardware has more, I think
> falling back to 1 makes more sense, as it'd be guaranteed to work.
>
I completely agree with you, thanks for your inputs.
Will add valid case 1:
Thanks,
Prakash
> >
> > > > + case 4:
> > > > + case 8:
> > > > + pdata->wires = data;
> > > > + break;
> > > > + default:
> > > > + pdata->wires = 1;
> > > > + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Unsupported buswidth, defaulting to 1 bit\n");
> > > > + }
> > > > +nodata:
> > > > + return pdata;
> > > > +}
>
> With the first case changed to "case 1:", this block makes sense to me.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
