On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 10:19:47AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [130205 09:28]: > > On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 08:56:13PM +0530, kishon wrote: > > > Hi Tony, Greg, > > > > > > On Tuesday 05 February 2013 08:54 PM, kishon wrote: > > > >Hi Tony, > > > > > > > >As discussed, I'm sending a pull request for the arch/arm part of my USB > > > >patches. These patches are necessary to get MUSB functional in both dt > > > >and non-dt boot. Also added dt data for dwc3 present in OMAP. This patch > > > >series *depends* on some of the patches which are merged in usb-next. > > > > > > This patch series should go in only after USB. Or else it will break > > > compilation. > > > > Then it probably should go through the USB tree, right? We don't want > > to break bisectability. > > Looks like this branch needs to be based on at least 01658f0f (usb: phy: > add a new driver for usb part of control module) to compile. Probably > needs other USB patches too to make sense. > > This branch has a high likelihood of conflicting with .dts files, so > Kishon, I suggest you do two branches: > > 1. A branch for Greg based on top of the USB changes > > This branch should contain: > > ARM: OMAP4: remove control module address space from PHY and OTG > ARM: OMAP: devices: create device for usb part of control module > ARM: OMAP2: MUSB: Specify omap4 has mailbox > ARM: OMAP: USB: Add phy binding information > > Naturally please make sure they compile and boot on their own. > Looks like this will only cause few trivial include merge conflicts > with what I have queued up. > > You can add my Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> for those. If that happens, please send me patches in email, I don't take git pull requests, especially for something as small as 4 patches. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
