On Monday 04 February 2013 08:04 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 08:08:55AM +0100, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:
On Friday 01 February 2013 03:48 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
...
+ /* xusb_hs_src */
+ val = readl(clk_base + CLK_SOURCE_XUSB_SS_SRC);
+ val |= BIT(25); /* always select PLLU_60M */
+ writel(val, clk_base + CLK_SOURCE_XUSB_SS_SRC);
+
+ clk = clk_register_fixed_factor(NULL, "xusb_hs_src", "pll_u_60M", 0,
+ 1, 1);
+ clks[xusb_hs_src] = clk;
+
With device tree we can directly use pll_u_60M, no need to register
clock with fixed factor 1.
Same comment for dis1-fixed, dsi2-fixed and mipi-cal-fast clocks.
Does it make sense to have separate DT IDs at all then?
We can use same DT ID.
Cheers,
Peter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
