On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 07:35:29AM +0100, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:
> On Saturday 02 February 2013 01:10 AM, Rhyland Klein wrote:
> > On 2/1/2013 5:18 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> >> Tegra114 introduces new PLL types. This requires new clocktypes as well
> >> as some new fields in the pll structure.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c | 719 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> drivers/clk/tegra/clk.h | 47 +++
> >> 2 files changed, 766 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c
> >> index 87d2f34..50114b7 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c
> >> [snip]
> >> +struct clk *tegra_clk_register_pllxc(const char *name, const char *parent_name,
> >> + void __iomem *clk_base, void __iomem *pmc,
> >> + unsigned long flags, unsigned long fixed_rate,
> >> + struct tegra_clk_pll_params *pll_params,
> >> + u32 pll_flags,
> >> + struct tegra_clk_pll_freq_table *freq_table,
> >> + spinlock_t *lock)
> >> +{
> >> + if (!pll_params->pdiv_tohw)
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> > This will cause the following warning:
> > warning: return makes pointer from integer without a cast
> >
> > Same with occurrences in tegra_clk_register_pllm and
> > tegra_clk_register_pllc.
> >
> > Should this instead be returning NULL?
>
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL)
>
Indeed. I noticed that only after I sent this patchset. Already fixed in
my own tree.
Cheers,
Peter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
