[PATCH v5 15/45] tick: Use get/put_online_cpus_atomic() to prevent CPU offline

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once stop_machine() is gone from the CPU offline path, we won't be able to
depend on preempt_disable() or local_irq_disable() to prevent CPUs from
going offline from under us.

Use the get/put_online_cpus_atomic() APIs to prevent CPUs from going offline,
while invoking from atomic context.

Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
index f113755..d123a2c 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
@@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ static void tick_do_broadcast(struct cpumask *mask)
  */
 static void tick_do_periodic_broadcast(void)
 {
+	get_online_cpus_atomic();
 	raw_spin_lock(&tick_broadcast_lock);
 
 	cpumask_and(to_cpumask(tmpmask),
@@ -167,6 +168,7 @@ static void tick_do_periodic_broadcast(void)
 	tick_do_broadcast(to_cpumask(tmpmask));
 
 	raw_spin_unlock(&tick_broadcast_lock);
+	put_online_cpus_atomic();
 }
 
 /*

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux