On Friday 11 January 2013, Matt Porter wrote: > The approach taken is similar to how OMAP DMA is being converted to > DMA Engine support. With the functional EDMA private API already > existing in mach-davinci/dma.c, we first move that to an ARM common > area so it can be shared. Adding DT and runtime PM support to the > private EDMA API implementation allows it to run on AM33xx. AM33xx > only boots using DT so we leverage Jon's generic DT DMA helpers to > register EDMA DMAC with the of_dma framework and then add support > for calling the dma_request_slave_channel() API to both the mmc > and spi drivers. I think this looks very good. What I wonder is whether we should make the non-DT parts of the dmaengine driver compile-time conditional on CONFIG_ATAGS though, so the slave drivers don't have a link-time dependency on the dmaengine driver's omap_dma_filter_fn symbol when building without ATAGS support. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
