On 12/19/2012 07:15 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > On Wednesday 19 December 2012 06:31 PM, Grant Likely wrote: >> On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:31:34 -0700, Stephen >> Warren<swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 12/17/2012 10:10 AM, Grant Likely wrote: >>>> On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 17:40:49 +0530, Laxman >>>> Dewangan<ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Aren't we still supposed to support platform data so that it can >>> override what's in DT in order to fix up bad DTs? Or, has that >>> requirement been dropped. If it has, we can drop a bunch of code from a >>> variety of Tegra-specific drivers, I expect. >> Do you have an actual user for this? If not, then don't borrow trouble. >> Just drop it. Things like platform_data can always be added later only >> if it is needed. > > Currently all our board supports DT. we are not using any driver > instantiated by board files. > I will remove the platform data for current patch and if it is require > then will add later with reasoning. > > Hope this will be fine with Stephen also so that this basic patch can > be included into tree soon. I'm fine with it; it's just a change in policy that hadn't been communicated before. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
