On 12/11/2012 10:31 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 09:57:51AM +0100, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > Okay, if there are no intree users that may be broken, then it should be > fine to remove it. In that case you might want to remove the pwm_id > field as well instead of deprecating it in this patch. The reason I marked the pwm_id as deprecated is to signal to out of tree users (if any) that they should stop using it since it is going to go away in the next cycle. If we remove it right away the sdp4030 board file will not going to compile in subsystem trees, only in linux-next. -- Péter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
