Re: [PATCHv2 2/2] scripts/kernel-doc: check that non-void fcts describe their return value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 27.11.2012 02:43, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 11/26/2012 01:22 PM, Yacine Belkadi wrote:
> 
>> If a function has a return value, but its kernel-doc comment doesn't contain a
>> "Return" section, then emit the following warning:
>>
>>    Warning(file.h:129): No description found for return value of 'fct'
>>
>> Note: This check emits a lot of warnings at the moment, because many functions
>> don't have a 'Return' doc section. So until the number of warnings goes
>> sufficiently down, the check is only performed in verbose mode.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yacine Belkadi <yacine.belkadi.1@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> Both patches:
> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Michal, please merge patches 1 and 2.

Thanks for the review and for adding me to CC. Yacine, could you please
resend the patches? I got unsubscribed from lkml yesterday, because my
@suse mail was bouncing :(.

Thanks,
Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux