Re: [PART6 Patch] mempolicy: fix is_valid_nodemask()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



(2012/11/01 3:21), David Rientjes wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Wen Congyang wrote:

From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

is_valid_nodemask() is introduced by 19770b32. but it does not match
its comments, because it does not check the zone which > policy_zone.

Also in b377fd, this commits told us, if highest zone is ZONE_MOVABLE,
we should also apply memory policies to it. so ZONE_MOVABLE should be valid zone
for policies. is_valid_nodemask() need to be changed to match it.

Fix: check all zones, even its zoneid > policy_zone.
Use nodes_intersects() instead open code to check it.


This changes the semantics of MPOL_BIND to be considerably different than
what it is today: slab allocations are no longer bound by such a policy
which isn't consistent with what userspace expects or is specified by
set_mempolicy() and there's no way, with your patch, to actually specify
that we don't care about ZONE_MOVABLE and that the slab allocations
_should_ actually be allocated on movable-only zones.  You have to respect
cases where people aren't interested in node hotplug and not cause a
regression.


I'm sorry if I misunderstand somehing....
I think people doesn't insterested in node-hotplug will never have MOVABLE_ZONE.
What causes regression ?

Thanks,
-Kame




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux