On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Wen Congyang <wency@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Current mem= implementation seems buggy because specification and > implementation doesn't match. Current mem= has been working > for many years and it's not buggy, it works as expected. So > we should update the specification. > > Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sort-of-tentatively-acked-by: Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx> So, is this an ACK or not? -- Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html