Hi Daniel, On Monday 22 October 2012 01:21 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 19.10.2012 11:59, Afzal Mohammed wrote:
+static const struct of_device_id omap_rtc_of_match[] = { + { .compatible = "ti,da830-rtc", + .data =&omap_rtc_devtype[OMAP_RTC_DATA_DA830_IDX],
Wouldn't it make sense to list all the compatible models here? The advantage of a compatible list is that we can name the models explicitly, or maybe at least "davinci-rtc". Is there any reason for this particular name?
Exact name followed by compatible models needs to be specified in DT node only, right ? (when driver for the first variant can handle it) And when additional features of newer IP's has to be leveraged, new entries can be added in the driver match table. First known variant of SoC for DT is da830 (exact name), hence it was used. Regards Afzal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
