On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:02:42PM +0000, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote: > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 16:45:58, Porter, Matt wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:26:20AM +0000, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote: > [...] > > > > > > I didn't see all the patches that you posted on edma-dmaengine-v3 > > > but I do seem them on edma-dmaengine-am33xx-v3 branch. > > > > I see I referenced the wrong branch in the cover letter. Thanks for > > testing and noticing this. Sorry to make you hunt for the correct > > branch in that repo. ;) > > > > No problem. > > > https://github.com/ohporter/linux/tree/edma-dmaengine-am33xx-v3 > > is indeed the correct branch for those wanting to pull this in or > > grab some of the not-to-be-merged drivers I used for testing. > > > > > I added a couple of patches to enable earlyprintk and build the DTB > > > appended kernel image uImage-dtb.am335x-evm > > > > > > Here's what i see > > > > > > [...] > > > > <snip> > > > > > [ 0.175354] edma: probe of 49000000.edma failed with error -16 > > > > I missed an uninitialized pdata case in the bug fixes mentioned in > > the changelog and the folks previously failing the same way didn't > > hit the case I suspect you are hitting. Can you try this and let me > > know how it works? > > > > That doesn't help :( Ok, so I dumped my Linaro toolchain which was masking this issue that you got unlucky with on EVM, whereas I was lucky. Switching toolchains I was able to reproduce the problem. Pantelis Antoniou suggested some changes and the following fixes this issue for me...verified on both BeagleBone and EVM. Let me know if that works on your end and I'll incorporate some version of it in the next update. diff --git a/arch/arm/common/edma.c b/arch/arm/common/edma.c index b761b7a..6ed394f 100644 --- a/arch/arm/common/edma.c +++ b/arch/arm/common/edma.c @@ -1598,6 +1598,8 @@ static struct of_dma_filter_info edma_filter_info = { static int __init edma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct edma_soc_info **info = pdev->dev.platform_data; + struct edma_soc_info *ninfo[EDMA_MAX_CC] = {NULL, NULL}; + struct edma_soc_info tmpinfo; s8 (*queue_priority_mapping)[2]; s8 (*queue_tc_mapping)[2]; int i, j, off, ln, found = 0; @@ -1614,15 +1616,13 @@ static int __init edma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) char irq_name[10]; struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node; struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; - struct edma_soc_info *pdata; int ret; if (node) { - pdata = devm_kzalloc(dev, - sizeof(struct edma_soc_info), - GFP_KERNEL); - edma_of_parse_dt(dev, node, pdata); - info = &pdata; + info = ninfo; + edma_of_parse_dt(dev, node, &tmpinfo); + info[0] = &tmpinfo; + dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, edma_filter_info.dma_cap); of_dma_controller_register(dev->of_node, of_dma_simple_xlate, > Looking at the original crash log, I suspect something is not correct > with the irq portion, probably in the DT or the driver. > > "genirq: Flags mismatch irq 28. 00000000 (edma) vs. 00000000 (edma)" > > The warning below that is coming due to fail case in edma_probe not tracking > the request_irq status properly and but IMO that's a separate issue. It is a separate issue, indeed. My ideal goal was to avoid changing anything in this existing davinci dma implementation, that's why the error paths were unmodified. Since I'm having to rework a few more things I'll look at those and generate an improved version. Russ Dill also made some good simplification/cleanup suggestions for the of parsing on irc which I'll incorporate in the next version. -Matt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
