On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 19:09:51, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 01:31:19PM +0000, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 11:30:14, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 04:57:42PM +0530, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> [...]
> > > > @@ -231,13 +290,56 @@ static int __devinit ecap_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
> > > > +
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * Some platform has extra PWM-subsystem common config space
> > > > + * and requires special handling of clock gating.
> > > > + */
> > > > + if (pdata && pdata->has_configspace) {
> > > > + r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 1);
> > > > + if (!r) {
> > > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no memory resource defined\n");
> > > > + ret = -ENODEV;
> > > > + goto err_disable_clock;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + pc->config_base = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, r->start,
> > > > + resource_size(r));
> > > > + if (!pc->config_base) {
> > > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to ioremap() registers\n");
> > > > + ret = -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
> > > > + goto err_disable_clock;
> > > > + }
> > >
> > > Isn't this missing a request_mem_region()? I assume you don't do that
> > > here because you need the same region in the EHRPWM driver, right?
> >
> > request_mem_region() is avoided as this region is shared across PWM
> > sub modules ECAP & EHRPWM.
> >
> > > This should be indication enough that the design is not right here.
> > > I think we need a proper abstraction here. Can this not be done via
> > > PM runtime support? If not, maybe this should be represented by
> > > clock objects since the bit obviously enables a clock.
> >
> > It is not done as part of PM runtime as this is has nothing to
> > do with clock tree of the SOC. The bits we were enabling here
> > should consider as an enable of the individual sub module as
> > part of IP integration. Hence we were handling these subsystem
> > module enable in the driver itself.
>
> My point remains valid: you shouldn't be able to access the same
> register through two different drivers. That's one of the reasons, if
> not the only reasen, why the request_mem_region() function exists. I
> think you should add some abstraction to provide this functionality to
> the drivers. I assume that eventually there will be more than just the
> PWM cores that require access to this register.
Enabling of PWM sub modules from CONFIG space is only present in AM33xx
as part of IP integration (ECAP, EHRPWM & EQEP).
Enabling of sub modules (ECAP, EHRPWM & EQEP) should do in CONFIG space.
Hence sub module drivers are accessing CONFIG space without reserving it
Individually from drivers (request_mem_region()).
Can you describe/point how it can be handled in a separate Abstraction layer
as this is shared across ECAP, EHRPWM & EQEP (EQEP driver is not yet available).
Adding it as part of PM runtime support is not a right place.
In PWM-SS, CONFIG Space is "Shared" across different sub modules and hence
can't be considered as a part of clock tree.
Thanks
Avinash
>
> Thierry
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
