On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 12:14:25, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 06:51:21AM +0000, Philip, Avinash wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 12:28:05, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 05:54:02PM +0530, Philip, Avinash wrote: > > > > Low Threshold Brightness should be configured to have a linear relation > > > > in brightness scale. This patch adds device tree support for low > > > > threshold brightness as optional one for pwm_backlight. > > > > > > I think this should be more explicit as to why this is required, perhaps > > > something like this: > > > > > > Some backlights perform poorly when driven by a PWM with a short > > > duty-cycle. For such devices, the low threshold can be used to > > > specify a lower bound for the duty-cycle and should be chosen to > > > exclude the problematic range. > > > > > > This patch adds support for an optional low-threshold-brightness > > > property. [snip] > > I think you never sent an updated patch or maybe I missed it. But I > noticed that this patch has now ended up in Andrew's tree without the > comments being addressed. Can you please follow up? I will send a revised patch. Thanks Avinash -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
