On Friday 07 September 2012 16:29:03 Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 05:28:17PM +0900, Alex Courbot wrote: > > We could make power sequences an option of its own and add #ifdefs to > > drivers that use it to lift this ambiguity, but I like the transparency > > of the current way. It also seems hard (illegal?) to get rid of the > > legacy DT interface. > If you're doing this I'd suggest using stubs rather than ifdefs in the > users, otherwise it's just going to cause lots of annoyance from > randconfig build. Is the code likely to big enough to worry about, > though? I don't think is will ever become big enough to bother. Moreover if the power seqs way meets acceptance, new drivers/frameworks are likely to use them as the only option, making it really mandatory. Alex. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
