Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: local timers: add timer support using IO mapped register

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/10/2012 7:40 PM, Cyril Chemparathy wrote:
On 8/10/2012 5:58 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
The current arch_timer only support accessing through CP15 interface.
Add support for ARM processors that only support IO mapped register
interface


It looks like this patch attempts to address both (a) non-percpu arch timers, and (b) memory mapped arch timers in one go. These should probably be broken out into two distinct logical changes.

Will split them.

More below...

Signed-off-by: Rohit Vaswani <rvaswani@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt         |    7 +
arch/arm/kernel/arch_timer.c | 259 ++++++++++++++++----
  2 files changed, 223 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt
index 52478c8..1c71799 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt
@@ -14,6 +14,13 @@ The timer is attached to a GIC to deliver its per-processor interrupts.

- clock-frequency : The frequency of the main counter, in Hz. Optional.

+- irq-is-not-percpu: Specify is the timer irq is *NOT* a percpu (PPI) interrupt + In the default case i.e without this property, the timer irq is treated as a
+  PPI interrupt. Optional.
+

The handling of non-percpu IRQs looks broken. The code does (enable/disable)_percpu_irq() on IRQs that may no longer be percpu.
I am thinking of adding a wrapper function (function pointer in the timer_ops) that will call (enable/disable)_percpu_irq() based on if the said property is defined or not.

+- If the node address and reg is specified, the arch_timer will try to use the memory
+  mapped timer. Optional.
+
  Example:

      timer {
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/arch_timer.c b/arch/arm/kernel/arch_timer.c
index 1d0d9df..09604b7 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/arch_timer.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/arch_timer.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
  #include <linux/clockchips.h>
  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
  #include <linux/of_irq.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
  #include <linux/io.h>

  #include <asm/cputype.h>
@@ -29,8 +30,17 @@
  static unsigned long arch_timer_rate;
  static int arch_timer_ppi;
  static int arch_timer_ppi2;
+static int is_irq_percpu;

  static struct clock_event_device __percpu **arch_timer_evt;
+static void __iomem *timer_base;
+

Are percpu memory mapped arch timers an impossibility?
I will make sure to keep this open , as in add memory mapped timers as well as the possibility of percpu timer interrupts for both memory mapped and the cp15 interface.

+struct arch_timer_operations {
+    void (*reg_write)(int, u32);
+    u32 (*reg_read)(int);
+    cycle_t (*get_cntpct)(void);
+    cycle_t (*get_cntvct)(void);
+};

  /*
   * Architected system timer support.
@@ -44,7 +54,29 @@ static struct clock_event_device __percpu **arch_timer_evt;
  #define ARCH_TIMER_REG_FREQ        1
  #define ARCH_TIMER_REG_TVAL        2

-static void arch_timer_reg_write(int reg, u32 val)
+/* Iomapped Register Offsets */
+#define ARCH_TIMER_CNTP_LOW_REG        0x000
+#define ARCH_TIMER_CNTP_HIGH_REG    0x004
+#define ARCH_TIMER_CNTV_LOW_REG        0x008
+#define ARCH_TIMER_CNTV_HIGH_REG    0x00C
+#define ARCH_TIMER_CTRL_REG        0x02C
+#define ARCH_TIMER_FREQ_REG        0x010
+#define ARCH_TIMER_CNTP_TVAL_REG    0x028
+#define ARCH_TIMER_CNTV_TVAL_REG    0x038
+

ARCH_TIMER_CNTV_TVAL_REG appears to be unused here.

+static void timer_reg_write_mem(int reg, u32 val)
+{
+    switch (reg) {
+    case ARCH_TIMER_REG_CTRL:
+        __raw_writel(val, timer_base + ARCH_TIMER_CTRL_REG);
+        break;
+    case ARCH_TIMER_REG_TVAL:
+        __raw_writel(val, timer_base + ARCH_TIMER_CNTP_TVAL_REG);
+        break;
+    }
+}
+

Wouldn't an array of offsets to map from ARCH_TIMER_REG_* to these memory mapped registers eliminate the need to switch-case your way through each register?
Done.

+static void timer_reg_write_cp15(int reg, u32 val)
  {
      switch (reg) {
      case ARCH_TIMER_REG_CTRL:
@@ -58,7 +90,28 @@ static void arch_timer_reg_write(int reg, u32 val)
      isb();
  }

-static u32 arch_timer_reg_read(int reg)
+static u32 timer_reg_read_mem(int reg)
+{
+    u32 val;
+
+    switch (reg) {
+    case ARCH_TIMER_REG_CTRL:
+        val = __raw_readl(timer_base + ARCH_TIMER_CTRL_REG);
+        break;
+    case ARCH_TIMER_REG_FREQ:
+        val = __raw_readl(timer_base + ARCH_TIMER_FREQ_REG);
+        break;
+    case ARCH_TIMER_REG_TVAL:
+        val = __raw_readl(timer_base + ARCH_TIMER_CNTP_TVAL_REG);
+        break;
+    default:
+        BUG();
+    }
+
+    return val;
+}
+

Same as above.

+static u32 timer_reg_read_cp15(int reg)
  {
      u32 val;

@@ -79,6 +132,103 @@ static u32 arch_timer_reg_read(int reg)
      return val;
  }

+static cycle_t arch_counter_get_cntpct_mem(void)
+{
+    u32 cvall, cvalh, thigh;
+
+    do {
+        cvalh = __raw_readl(timer_base + ARCH_TIMER_CNTP_HIGH_REG);
+        cvall = __raw_readl(timer_base + ARCH_TIMER_CNTP_LOW_REG);
+        thigh = __raw_readl(timer_base + ARCH_TIMER_CNTP_HIGH_REG);
+    } while (cvalh != thigh);
+
+    return ((cycle_t) cvalh << 32) | cvall;
+}
+
+static cycle_t arch_counter_get_cntpct_cp15(void)
+{
+    u32 cvall, cvalh;
+
+ asm volatile("mrrc p15, 0, %0, %1, c14" : "=r" (cvall), "=r" (cvalh));
+
+    return ((cycle_t) cvalh << 32) | cvall;
+}
+
+static cycle_t arch_counter_get_cntvct_mem(void)
+{
+    u32 cvall, cvalh, thigh;
+
+    do {
+        cvalh = __raw_readl(timer_base + ARCH_TIMER_CNTV_HIGH_REG);
+        cvall = __raw_readl(timer_base + ARCH_TIMER_CNTV_LOW_REG);
+        thigh = __raw_readl(timer_base + ARCH_TIMER_CNTV_HIGH_REG);
+    } while (cvalh != thigh);
+
+    return ((cycle_t) cvalh << 32) | cvall;
+}
+

Repetitive - the logic is identical to arch_counter_get_cntpct_mem() above.

+static cycle_t arch_counter_get_cntvct_cp15(void)
+{
+    u32 cvall, cvalh;
+
+ asm volatile("mrrc p15, 1, %0, %1, c14" : "=r" (cvall), "=r" (cvalh));
+
+    return ((cycle_t) cvalh << 32) | cvall;
+}
+
+static struct arch_timer_operations arch_timer_ops_cp15 = {
+    .reg_read = &timer_reg_read_cp15,
+    .reg_write = &timer_reg_write_cp15,
+    .get_cntpct = &arch_counter_get_cntpct_cp15,
+    .get_cntvct = &arch_counter_get_cntvct_cp15,
+};
+
+static struct arch_timer_operations arch_timer_ops_mem = {
+    .reg_read = &timer_reg_read_mem,
+    .reg_write = &timer_reg_write_mem,
+    .get_cntpct = &arch_counter_get_cntpct_mem,
+    .get_cntvct = &arch_counter_get_cntvct_mem,
+};
+
+static struct arch_timer_operations *arch_specific_timer = &arch_timer_ops_cp15;
+
+static inline void arch_timer_reg_write(int reg, u32 val)
+{
+    arch_specific_timer->reg_write(reg, val);
+}
+
+static inline u32 arch_timer_reg_read(int reg)
+{
+    return arch_specific_timer->reg_read(reg);
+}
+
+static inline cycle_t arch_counter_get_cntpct(void)
+{
+    return arch_specific_timer->get_cntpct();
+}
+
+static inline cycle_t arch_counter_get_cntvct(void)
+{
+    return arch_specific_timer->get_cntvct();
+}
+

The 4 pointer chasers above could lose some verbosity by being #defines.
I am rebasing this patch on top of Marc's similar patch to add support for virtual timers and will fix up the problems you have mentioned.
Thanks for your feedback.

<snip>


Thanks,
Rohit Vaswani

--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux