On 08/26/2012 08:12 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Sun, 26 Aug 2012, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> On 08/26/2012 04:27 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: >> >>> >>> "cpus" parameter was removed here: >>> >>> commit b9403130a5350fca59a50ed11c198cb8c7e54119 >>> Author: Michael Wang <wangyun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Date: Thu Jul 12 16:10:13 2012 +0800 >>> >>> sched/cleanups: Add load balance cpumask pointer to 'struct lb_env' >>> >>> With this patch struct ld_env will have a pointer of the load balancing >>> cpumask and we don't need to pass a cpumask around anymore. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <wangyun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> >> Patch already sent and acked by Peter. >> Hopefully it is being merged by Peter or Ingo... > > i guess i should make more of an effort to track the individual > trees. next time. :-) Tracking 180 or more trees is too cumbersome IMO. It should be sufficient to just check linux-next and make patches if they are needed there. -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
