On Thursday, August 16, 2012, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> Overdue revision of this new feature, some changes required additional thought
> and rework.
>
> The most important change is in the way power sequences are expressed in the
> device tree. In order to avoid having to specify #address-cells, #size-cells and
> reg properties, the @ notation in the step names is dropped, and instead a
> fixed, sequential naming is adopted. The type of the resource used by a step is
> decided by the presence of some recognized properties:
>
> power-on-sequence {
> step0 {
> regulator = "power";
> enable;
> };
> step1 {
> delay = <10000>;
> };
> step2 {
> pwm = "backlight";
> enable;
> };
> ...
>
> To me this looks safe, clear and close to the platform data representation, but
> needs approval from DT experts.
>
> Resources are still referenced by name instead of having their phandles defined
> directly inside the sequences, as previous discussion came to the conclusion
> that doing so would require controversial changes to the regulator and PWM
> frameworks, and that having the resources declared at the device level was
> making sense logically speaking.
>
> Other changes/fixes since last revision:
> * Move to drivers/power/ (hope this is ok with the maintainers?)
> * Use microseconds for delay
> * Use devm for PWM resources and remove cleanup function as all resources are
> devm-managed
> * Remove "-gpio" suffix for GPIO reference in the driver
> * Remove params structure
> * Make power_seq structure private
> * Number of steps in a sequence is explicitly stated instead of resorting to a
> "stop" sequence step
> * Delays are a step instead of being a step parameter
> * Use flexible member arrays to limit number of memory allocations
> * Add documentation to DT bindings
>
> There was a lot of feedback on the previous version (thanks!) so if I forgot
> to address some important point, please bring it to my attention again.
>
> Alexandre Courbot (3):
> Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences
> pwm_backlight: use power sequences
> tegra: add pwm backlight device tree nodes
May I ask that the next version of this patchset be CCed to
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
